Reply to USSC decision on AA expected next month

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "USSC decision on AA expected next month "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Until Clarence Thomas resigns from the Supreme Court for being corrupt, no decision it renders where he is a deciding vote is legitimate.  [/quote]

+2.[/quote]

How dare he step out of line.[/quote]

[b]How dare he accept hundreds of thousands in undeclared donations.[/quote][/b]

Not legally required to report.  YOu know this. All the justices supplement their income (poor by comparison to law firm partners' salaries) this way.  It's always been this way. The left just wants to tar and feather Thomas.  Again[/quote]

DP. Maybe not legal, but law scholars agree he broke the ethics in terms of reporting. The extravagant trips are debatable (though, c'mon, man, if my husband has to pay out of pocket for a guest lecturer's lunch at his govt job because of ethics concerns, there is really no excuse for this -- you know better), but the real estate transaction and payment for his ward were clear violations.

As to the person who cited Sotomayor, yes she did not recuse herself, but interesting that you failed to note that Gorsuch was in the exact same position. How did you miss that! Both, unlike Thomas, Gorsuch and Sotomayor declared their involvement with the publisher. Gorsuch also sold property to a person who's company had business before the Court and did not recuse himself. You missed that one too.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics