Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "The wisdom of rewarding Montgomery’s school employees (Washington Post)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote]I am for our kids. I support the principle that my taxes support the education of our children in the public system. While the grade assignments work for many kids it doesn't for my kids. Since my kids are required to stay in their assigned grade classrooms even though they are 3 to 4 grade levels above the current MCPS standards and cannot place out or test out, can we get a refund? For the kids for whom MCPS cannot accommodate (e.g., math) can citizens op out? We will gladly invest the refunded $12,000/kid/yr (this is a back of the envelope calculation) for other alternatives. This is a win win situation for both parties.[/quote] [quote]This is a slightly different question. [b]I agree, MPCS doesn't serve the kids who are in the top 90-95% and something needs to be done[/b]. Many, many MoCo kids are 3-4 grade levels above the current MCPS standards. Magnet kids are 7-8 grade levels above MCPS standards, or more. Possible answers include charters (I would support) or refunding your taxes to you so you can go private (I wouldn't support, because only rich families would be able to top up the $12K to afford $35K at private). But these are separate questions from "should we pay MoCo teachers a decent salary to teach the majority of kids" and maybe deserve a different thread.[/quote] I disagree. MCPS aprox. $2 billion budget. Finds a way to give teachers a 7% raise but can't find a way to meet the needs of 90 to 95% of our children so they are stuck in a system they pay for for a decade? Does allowing these able and capable students to appropriately advance in certain subjects (e.g., math ) wipe out the MCPS budget? Does it add anything to the budget? How much has mcps saved by the elimination of math pathways and the prohibition of any upward movement? The MCPS leadership is paid handsomely. I want to know how much MCPS saves, if any, by this prohibition for a subject (math) that is the essential gateway in our technological age we live in? On a different note, are children that are not performing allowed to move down (e.g., math)? Is the prohibition in both directions on the pathway?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics