Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Tell me about Amherst"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Does your child like school socially? I worry it is too isolated. Seems like the fun would be at UMass Amherst and that would clearly not be a walk to get over there. Also what kind of internships did your child secure while there. We want to be open to other parts of the country but also want to make sure we don’t get an “I am bored” call a few months in when tbe fun seems to be large schools. Thoughts?[/quote] Lots to do at Amherst because it’s a great college town right next to campus and plenty of free buses connecting the colleges and Northampton, an even better town. Would not call UMass unwalkable because the walk is through a pleasant downtown and that extends tolerable walking times; could be 20-35 minutes depending on where you want to go (but at least one free bus will likely pass you on the way, so look behind if you are walking and be aware of the downtown stops if you don’t want to walk anymore). Is this a boy? He’ll have lots of opportunities to go to Smith and Mount Holyoke parties (free busing). A girl could go to UMass frat row (20 -25 minute walk) if that’s her thing. Or, navigate between the woke students and the 35-40% athletes (more athletes, numerically, than U. of Alabama) and party on campus. A lot of the campus tension I suspect comes from the ridiculous number of (mostly white) recruited athletes and the schools “commitment” to a diverse racial class. This is a built in contradiction. If child is unhooked, be aware that every year admissions % decreases but number of URMs and athletes stay the same. By definition, then, the non-hooked rate is yearly decreasing faster than the overall admissions rate. The real admissions rate for non-hooked kids is therefore much, much lower than it appears (and that is already very low). (The Amherst no-legacy thing is a PR fake out: the athletes the real “white privilege” issue.)[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics