Reply to Hannah Natanson at it again

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "Hannah Natanson at it again"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Her stories all have an angle from the far left, including this article. How about an article about the straight up pornography in Gender Queer? How would it compare to pornography books not allowed in school libraries?[/quote]

It’s not “pornography”. Stop pushing lies. [/quote]

It shows a man giving fellatio to another man.  Is that no longer considered pornography?[/quote]

It’s ok because it’s illustrated, not an actual picture. That makes it artsy and “challenging.” LOL.

In all seriousness I don’t have a huge problem with HS age kids and up reading those kind of graphic novels, but come on - they shouldn’t be offered in school libraries. When I was in HS we had to get parental permission to watch Schindler’s List in history class as 15/16 year olds because it was R rated, and yes there were parents who didn’t allow it and those kids had to do another project for the week. [/quote]

1. You are referencing Gender Queer, not Lawn Boy.  Lawn Boy is not a graphic novel.  
2. Gender Queer does not show a man giving fellatio to another man.  
I've read both.  You clearly have not. 
This is exactly why reporters like Hannah Natanson should be fired.  People rely on reporters at news sources such as The Washington Post to report on news after doing their research. She always seems scant on details and clearly didn't read either book, which lead to widespread misinformation about the books. [/quote]

The only one trafficking in misinformation is yourself about Gender Queer. Please cite that Gender Queer doesn't show that (we'll be waiting...forever).[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics