Reply to Should you do PreK if you don't need the childcare?

Forum Index » Infants, Toddlers, & Preschoolers

Reply to "Should you do PreK if you don't need the childcare?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]PK3 is a little optional but PK4 should be required.  And PK3 will be helpful to your kid, so why wouldn’t you do it?[/quote]

OP here.  I think this is sort of what I'm feeling. Do we need PK3? (i.e., is it the BEST use of his time). By pk4 I'm sure I'll feel like he is ready, and needs it to prep for K.

My answer to why not is that he's really thriving with his park play group now. He he learns letters, numbers, and spanish with the nanny, and spends time exploring the world in a way he won't be able to do in a classroom/playground. Classrooms also have a ton of useful benefits, but he will definitely be getting that soon... so should he appreciate the opportunity for open ended time while he can?

And to answer a previous question... 2.5yo is a he... I try to think it doesn't matter... #2 is a girl though, so we'll see if I keep that outlook over the next few years... [/quote]

Oh he's already doing a park playgroup? Then I don't think you need PK3. He's getting socialization, getting out into nature, etc. I say keep on keeping on. [/quote]

+1 provided the other park group kids don't move to PK3 next year.  [/quote]
+2
If you have a decent PK3 near you, many of those kids may decamp for that next year.  Definitely do PK4.[/quote]

It's all but a guarantee that most or all of them will decamp.  It is not remotely common in DC to keep a kid out of free preschool in favor of a park meetup.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics