Reply to DC should abolish ANCs

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "DC should abolish ANCs"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]+1, I was hoping no one would run in my ANC boundary because we have a vacant property issue (developer basically abandoned a project that is now constantly full of water, bugs, trash, and crime) and every time I try to get it addressed I'm instructed to talk to my ANC rep. I'd take to the ANC rep who was like "I have zero power to do anything except alert our council member, plus I have a full time job and this gig is unpaid and I'm burned out, best of luck to you." Was hoping no one would run so the next time I call my council member's office, if they told me to go through the ANC rep I could just say we don't have one and they'd have to deal with me.

But then last minute someone decided to run. So now once she's elected, she's going to have to deal with me complaining about this and asking her to help me get it addressed. I hope she's ready.

Like 10 people told me to just run for the position myself. I don't want it! You have to go to trainings and meetings and do all this admin. I don't have time for that, I have a job and a kid. I just want this giant safety and health hazard a block away to finally get addressed.

I hate the ANC system.[/quote]

Go through your ANC Chair then.

There is variation across the city but our ANC works great.[/quote]

I think you missed the point.  There shouldn't be a volunteer interlocutor acting as a docent for the Council and Wilson Building.[/quote]

they are elected- the statute specifically makes ANCs the voice of the neighborhood. You can also go directly to your Councilmember. If you think abolishing ANCs will give you greater access, you are woefully unclear on the subject. [/quote]

They serve no point other than to insulate our legislators and city government from individuals.  It's really bad structural design to interject a powerless elected volunteer as a mandated go between.  It creates a system whereby special interests have a direct line to the policy makers while individuals are separated by a redundant advocate.  Structurally it does nothing but enable our real elected officials and paid public officials to avoid accountability.  If residents need a sherpa to get constituent services from council members or navigate city services then that means those things aren't being provided properly.

What were we going to do if we got statehood?  DC is desperately in need of local government reform. 
[/quote]

So you think having fewer representative bodies is going to increase your representation?  you think your Councilmember's constituent services person is going to weigh in on the pothole on your street?  And there's nothing stopping you from contacting your Council member (or voting against them).  [/quote]

That's the point.  They aren't representatives.  They're semi-glorified docents that perpetuate the problem and function to cut residents out of the decision making loop.  Making the Council more like a proper legislature by expanding it and creating smaller districts would provide better services and more representation.

OP's insider description is accurate.  [/quote]

They are literally elected to be your representative with a statutory mandate to hold public meetings.  There's nothing "insider" about that.  You feel they are not representing you the way you want.  Which means you should elect a different one.  
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics