Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "NYT: Supreme Court Wrestles With Case on Pigs, Cruelty and Commerce"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]CA will get smacked down. This is infringing on the constitution and the federal government's control over interstate commerce.[/quote] Ironic that pig farmers may have more rights than abortion seekers....[/quote] Nothing ironic about it. Pig farmers are men, mostly white men, which means there should be no restriction on what they do in the view of the GOP. I’m sure someone will find a religious justification for this inhumane treatment of the commerce one doesn’t fly. [/quote] Lol. Interstate commerce is protected in the constitution. Where is abortion in the constitution? But keep on crowing about race like a moron. [/quote] Interstate commerce doesn’t prevent states from setting their own standards and requirements. California can require products from North Carolina to meet the same rules as California products. It isn’t discriminating against NC to apply a consistent rule. [/quote] Good luck with that argument at the supreme court. That's like trying to claim CA can set its own standards for food and drugs, which is entirely out of their power and in control of the federal govt through the FDA. CA cannot set a different standard for making a cancer drug, for example, compared to what the rest of the country accepts via FDA approval. The federal govt control standards and quality for food and drugs sold for interstate commerce. CA will get smacked down.[/quote] It’s already established law that states can have higher requirements and standards. Otherwise every state would be stuck with Mississippi’s standards. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics