Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "For those of you cheat on your tax return..."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Perhaps you don't realize this but it is very difficult for wage earners to cheat on their taxes in a material way. Almost all of your income is going to be reported to the IRS (i.e. W-2, 1099, etc.) so there is very little tax evasion in this income group. Brokerages track the basis for securities now so that one loophole has mostly been closed unless you've owned securities for a very long time. The vast majority of tax evasion comes from the 1%.[/quote] Perhaps you don't realize this but cheating is very common among those paying low/ no taxes. Think about all those tips or cash transactions. Think about highly-questionable benefits or child credits. That's a huge pot of money the IRS could well go after.[/quote] 1) They already go after this group the most. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/where-does-the-irs-audit-the-most-poor-rural-counties-that-are-mostly-black/ 2) Refundable credits like the EITC and the CTC are the most scrutinized at the IRS, and are the easiest to audit. 3) The money from these audits is not a lot bc these people don’t have a lot. Audits of wealthier people result in more tax even with the increased costs.[/quote] 1) Not true, not even by a mile (and the report in the very link you provided shows why) 2) Easiest to audit: Yes. Most scrutinized: not by a mile 3) You don't understand volume. 20 million people x $500 = $10 billion in easy-to-get tax dollars. That's more than fighting 10 billionaires to death and getting $500M from each -- which rarely ever happens to begin with.[/quote] +1 I don't see why people don't get this. Small amounts from millions of people usually adds up to a much bigger amount than a large amount from one individual. I see this in discussions of corporate pay. Reducing a CEO's pay by $10 million and spreading that over tens of thousands of employees does not result in a noticeable pay increase for any employee. Same principle at work as above. (Not meant as a defense of executive management pay--current practices have many problems, but it is generally not the root of low employee pay.)[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics