Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Unhoused and subsidized in DC"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Isn't it crazy to accommodate so many in DC, why can't federal government give them incentives to go to areas where cost of living is low and entry level jobs in abundance?[/quote] Or repopulate dying towns. It's way too complex and nuanced a subject for DCUM but the lack of population mobility - for which there are sometimes good reasons - is one of the problems we face as a country. We should also build low income housing directly instead of using section 8. Section 8 just ends up increasing rents. Can't we take what we've learned from the problems with "projects" and section 8 and try something new. Some sort of middle ground where we build it but create a process to transfer ownership to the tenants over time.[/quote] Yes dust off the failed 1960’s policies. [/quote] Should we continue with the failed 1980's policies? Or go back to failed 1930's policies? They've all failed. We need to take the parts of each policy that worked and remix them into something new.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics