Reply to Title One Schools

Forum Index » VA Public Schools other than FCPS

Reply to "Title One Schools"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Agree. Being designated Title One just means the school meets s threshold of kids that have free/reduced lunch. In your case it sounds like because neighborhood people are opting out. It does not change the school fundamentally other than providing more resources. It’s actually a good thing.[/quote]

Speaking as a parent who sent two kids to Title I/Title 1-eligible elementary, middle, and high schools:

[b]If your school has already been close to the FRL% that makes it eligible for Title I, then you won't see a big difference in the make-up of the school.  Title I's benefits, as others have stated, do include additional funding, a cap on class sizes, exposure and interaction with a more diverse student body (racially, culturally, and socioeconomically), and other "perks."[/b]

However, if you're comparing a Title I school to a non-Title I school, there usually are very significant differences academically and socially.  PTAs are not as well-funded and therefore cannot provide the same level of additional support and enrichment programs wealthier schools do.  If you also have a large # of ELL students, a lot of efforts and focus are likely to be directed toward those students' needs.  Academic pace and depth of study/instruction can be significantly slower and less encompassing than affluent, high-performing schools.  Basic education is the same; richness and experience differs greatly.

The leadership makes all the difference.  Our elementary school changed principals 3 times during the time our family was there.  First principal was great and expected every individual child, regardless of background, to achieve his/her potential - not just meet minimum standards.  After that one's retirement, the new principal had a much different focus which had positive effects - like increasing engagement of non-English speaking community (half the school); but unfortunately any benefits were at the cost of the other students.  That principal was a first-time principal after being an assistant principal at a very affluent school with a very different student body.  The third principal was an experienced and very loved principal from another non=-title I elementary school, but still had a significant # of ELL students and had demonstrated good success with student achievement.  After being out of the school for a few years once our kids aged out, we attended a community event at the school and the whole atmosphere was completely different under this 3rd principal v. the predecessor.  It was lively and active; PTA and general parental participation was greater; parents were more enthusiastic about the school and its leadership.  It was a welcomed return to better days.

All that said, OP, you need to evaluate your specific school for yourself.  The Title I designation isn't the determining factor.  If your daughter is visibly unhappy, you have good reason to investigate and research your options.  Title I designation and funding isn't going to change her experience, unless there's a shift in the leadership as well.  Why is your daughter unhappy?  What is YOUR sense of the teachers, the principal, the quality of instruction?  How do YOU feel when you walk into the building or attend a meeting or event there?  Visit other schools you are able to transfer to/lottery into and compare.  Maybe even attend an event there with your daughter and see how she reacts v. when she's at an event at your current school.

Despite the academic differences, I am not aware of any middle class, English-proficient students from our elementary school who were not sufficiently prepared for middle school or high school.  My own kids are just as capable as any other student coming from non-title I elementaries.  For me overall, my kids have had outstanding academic experiences as well as some leaving a lot to be desired; but I am grateful they have been in more diverse schools v. vast majority very affluent white schools.  Advantages and disadvantages to everything.  There are schools that strike a great balance, however.  If I were to do it again?  I don't regret our choices per se; but I don't know if I would try something different instead, TBH.[/quote]

It boils down to being a title I school, but not too title I. Once a school is designated, there is no further financial benefit to having more FARMs students. Crossing the threshold can be great for a school, but a school with a very high poverty rate will likely have worse outcomes [/quote]

OP here. I'm not entirely sure where the high poverty rate is coming from. Most neighborhoods here are 800-1.2m houses and there are several townhouse communities nearby as well. If those families put their kids in this school, it would be more balanced. Our neighborhoods are packed with kids under 10. It is what it is though. I'm glad to hear that title one designation isn't a death spiral. I truly wish it could become a language immersion school. I think if the school were taught in 2 languages, it would be great. The barrier is language and the school's inability to teach English language effectively. [/quote]

MVCS tried that and it didn't raise scores/academic achievement significantly at all. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics