Reply to Has LEO priority changed from community protection to self-protection?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Has LEO priority changed from community protection to self-protection?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Maybe if civilians didn’t have so many guns cops wouldn’t be so afraid. 🤔 [/quote]

+1 LEOs should be brave, but at the end of the day, going after that gunman would have been a suicidal mission.  If four men had rushed him, maybe 3 would have been shot dead.  Doesn’t mean that’s not their job, but we should have some empathy for the fact that these school officers are not Secret Service officers.  Some may not have signed up with the idea that they need to throw their body in front of a crazed teen with 2 automatic weapons with 200 bullets.  That’s a big ask.  [/quote]

But, you see, the Republican platform is "It's fine that assault weapons are so easily available," because our "law enforcement heroes" will protect us from "criminals."

But when yet another freak starts firing his assault weapon, what do cops do?  "Establish a perimeter!"

It's hard to blame them, until you remember they're nearly all Republicans who are all about "gun owners' (including mass shooters) rights."   Establish that perimeter![/quote]

Republicans say that because they can’t admit any restrictions on guns could possibly be correct.  Most are hypocrites and have blood on their hands.  Thoughts and prayers indeed.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics