Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Is it reasonable to want to connect with your partner in all levels?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I have this ideal of being able to have a “deep” relationship with my partner. By deep I mean being affectionate, emotionally close, have a solid friendship, care about each other’s day, and be able to share what’s on our minds. An area where this always falters is sharing what’s on our minds. If we discuss politics or our opinions on current events or a book or something, the conversation devolves into arguing. I want to be able to disagree but not argue. I also want to hear my partners thoughts even if I may not agree with them. A lot of people just take the stance of….let’s just never talk about these topics. Going that route seems shallow to me. Am I asking for too much? I don’t expect my partner to be my everything fyi. But would prefer if we could have conversations with depth.[/quote] What you want, OP, is perfectly reasonable. Re: what's on your minds: in general, the key here is for your and your partner to share some interests while respecting and supporting each other's fascination with non-shared interests. So, for example, if you love mystery novels and your SO thinks they are kind of meh, while s/he/they love Food Network channel and you are not that into it, that's fine as long as you don't have contempt for each other's preferences. Re: politics and current events: while I agree with a previous poster that looking to understand each other's views is key, in the current political climate, some issues are frankly a matter of having integrity and principles or not. Debating foreign policy based upon legitimate understanding of a particular issue is absolutely worthy of listening to one another with the goal of understanding views; by contrast, there is zero point in discussing the "merits" of replacement theory, and any partner who attempted to persuade me otherwise would be my ex-partner in a NY minute. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics