Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Should we arm the Ukraine with nuclear weapons?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Look, it's one thing for Ukraine to have had Soviet-era nuclear missiles they could have used as a deterrent against Russian aggression. A lot of PPs are raising the suggestion that having nuclear weapons is a good thing because it acts as a deterrent. By extension, they're suggesting maybe nuclear weapons are a viable source of protection when a nation finds itself threatened with invasion. It's not, for a very simple reason. Remember when we were worried about Trump irresponsibly and in a drunken state pushing the button? Well, our country still runs well enough that effective checks and balances prevent this from happening. But this is not the case for a lot of countries with weak governments. Imagine Afghanistan having a nuclear weapon. The same government that capitulated within days of the U.S. pulling out. The same government that turned over all the U.S. sourced weapons to extremist Islamic groups. Extremists who think you automatically go to paradise when you die in battle. This is the reason nuclear weapons are an extremely dangerous form of deterrence. No, we should not arm Ukraine or any other nation with nuclear weapons. It's bad enough that they exist.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics