Reply to S/O for people who oppose “social promotion,” who’s going to pay for it?

Forum Index » Schools and Education General Discussion

Reply to "S/O for people who oppose “social promotion,” who’s going to pay for it? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If schools intensively intervened in first, second grades, and third grades instead of waiting for kids to fail and not learn how to read it wouldn’t cost that much compared to all the money didn’t in literacy coaches and equity coaches and programs. The most equitable thing schools can do is to teach kids to read well. [/quote]

OMG this is so freaking true.

However, it is also true that school administrators make it nearly impossible to retain a student in Kindergarten.

I have a student right now who absolutely definitely positively should not move on to first grade.  They simply are not developmentally ready.  No amount of reading intervention is able to help (and I am very successful with reading intervention).  They are VERY young -- birthday right on the cut off.  But I cannot get permission to retain the child, as "research shows" retention seldom is beneficial and indeed can be harmful.  I'm so frustrated.[/quote]

Clearly you aren't that successful if this child isn't reading and this child needs a different approach.

But, this.  We need to catch kids very early and provide them with supports and not just wait till later ES or MS.  Our schools and parents failed these kids very early on.  This is why waiting to start teaching kids to read later is a very bad idea.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics