Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Divorced SAHMs and younger professional women: sugar babies?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why does wanting to date someone who is generous and giving equate to a sex worker? When I think sex worker, I think envelop of cash in exchange for an act. [/quote] I think OP's point is there is a vernacular used by would-be sugar babies that includes the word "generous." It can be hard to tell who is using that word more innocently versus who is talking in code about an arrangement. OP, I think the answer is what do the photos show. The "seeking arrangement" types are going to have a different set of photographs than a woman who uses that term with no ulterior motive or knowledge of what it can signal. At least that was my experience when I was doing the dating app thing and swiping left and right on women. (I'm actually a pretty generous guy, but I wasn't "seeking arrangement" and I was turned off by that sort of language. But I also wasn't particularly interested in dating 20-somethings -- I was 47 at the time).[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
