Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Police Brutality at Purdue"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] The cop will have to prove that there was a reasonable suspicion that the man committed a crime. Talking loudly is not reasonable suspicion. If the woman had a black eye or somebody on the scene said that there was an assault on the woman there would have been reasonable suspicion. That did not exist. [/quote] No. The burden of proof is going to depend on who is bringing a lawsuit. If the guy brings a civil suit against the cops, he's going to have to prove some things. If the State brings a criminal case against the guy, it's going to have to prove some things. And reasonable suspicion of a crime is not the only thing that would justify use of force. If the guy refused a lawful order to move away from a witness while the cop sought to interview that witness, the cop would have justification to use some level of force to stop him from interfering with that investigation. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
