Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Typical MoCo big govt overreach/over regulation - bill to control restaurant menus for kids"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OP, why are you getting your panties in a twist for restaurants having to provide "ONE health option". And I am no fan of Jawando.[/quote] Because it imposes unnecessary regulation that adds costs. People can think for themselves. Businesses should be able to run themselves as they see fit. If unhealthy food options for kids are a problem, parents can choose for themselves whether or not to visit the establishment. No one needs more regulators, more fines, and more govt control. [/quote] How much cost do you think it would add? You don't even have to reprint the menu. Just get a piece of paper, print out the additional item, and put it in the menu as an insert. The cost is the amount of toner/paper you use. As for the extra menu item, if they serve chicken nugget with fries, they can alter it to serve chicken nugget with carrots or something like that. Most of the restaurants already have these alternatives. TBH, I think it's a good idea to give parents alternatives. They aren't forced to choose it. I hate MoCo, but this is not an "overreach" hill I would die on.[/quote] It’s going to be the most difficult for small ethnic establishments to comply. Think of how hard it will be for a struggling neighborhood pupuseria or a banh-mi shop to have to determine the total calories and calories from fat of every item on the menu. And for what purpose? All fast food chains already have all of this data and even if they didn’t the compliance burden would be minimal. For these small businesses, it would be a substantial burden. This is at its core an anti-competitive regulation. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics