Reply to Occupy Newt's Brain

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Occupy Newt's Brain"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is all sound and fury, signifying nothing, Mr. Steele.  Romney will be the nominee, and the criticisms being leveled now are exactly where Obama was going to go in the general election.  I'd say that it might marginally help Romney to get these things out now, except Obama's friends in the media will never treat Bain Capital as old news no matter how many times it has been raised before.

It really may come down to where the unemployment number is in November, with Obama losing at 8% plus, and winning if the unemployment number is lower.  In 50/50 nation, every presidential election is kind of touch and go.  [/quote]

If it is so clear that Romney is the nominee, why was it so un-freaking clear to you people for the last six months??!!!  You all are just parroting the last thing your conservative handlers tell you.[/quote]

I, for one, predicted this on this site several times months ago.  [/quote]

So that makes you smart, and conversely the 75% of non-Romney supporters are morons.  Because they kept running from candidate to candidate in order to NOT support Romney.  I[b] guess if you are willing to accept that 75% of conservatives are idiots[/b], that's fine.  OR maybe they won't vote for Romney in the South, in which case you and the pundits will swing 180.[/quote]

Your penchant for name-calling is incredibly childish and detracts from your post, and your "statistics" are pulled from the air.[/quote]

Penchant?  I don't know who exactly you think I am.  However, I think that your party's mad dash to Bachmann - > Cain - > Perry  (or was it the other way around?) can only be described as idiotic.  If you have a better word for it, let me know because it was apparently clear to you what needed to happen all along.  [/quote]

I think tossing words around like "idiot" are not helpful in any kind of discussion. Of course, I can't know that you have a penchant, but there's an abrasiveness about your posts. Bachman, Cain, and Perry were never my personal choices; but I still don't think it's helpful to refer to people as "idiots" and "morons."[/quote]

OK, I get your point.  But I find it hard to give these voters the benefit of the doubt.  The limitations of these candidates were plain to see.  I'm not sure what to call a person who failed to see them repeatedly.  Note that I left out Gingrich, because despite his faults he is not an unqualified candidate.

So the point remains that either these people are {insert your favorite term for people who make repeatedly poor choices} or there is a distinct lack of interest in Romney beyond being the candidate of last resort.[/quote]

I'm probably a much more conservative voter than you but actually do agree with your comments questioning why anyone would seriously consider Bachman, Cain, Perry (or Palin!) as a possible president of our country. I don't really like any of our options. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics