Reply to Does Men’s College Soccer Survive the Supreme Court’s Ruling?

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "Does Men’s College Soccer Survive the Supreme Court’s Ruling?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Do you people read? The issue is the NCAA offering more 'educational' benefits to college-athletes. No one is getting salaries. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kristidosh/2021/06/21/what-does-supreme-court-decision-against-ncaa-mean-for-name-image-and-likeness/?sh=5ea172dd500c [/quote]

From the article you posted: 
[Quote]
Over the weekend, however, the conversation took a turn when a group of commissioners—said to include those from the SEC, ACC and Pac-12—began urging an approach that put the onus on each individual institution to determine its own name, image and likeness rules instead of a set of rules at the NCAA level.

The letter said previous proposals at the NCAA level will lead to “inevitable confusion, uncertainty and likely litigation against the NCAA and its member conferences and institutions.” Instead, it proposes that institutions in states with state laws follow their laws while [b] institutions without state laws could create rules at the institutional level with only two guidelines: “(A) don’t allow school employees or boosters to pay athletes, and (B) don’t allow payments in exchange for athletic performance or recruiting inducement.”[/b][/quote]

Ultimately, if a school doesn’t want to create those rules/guidelines because they are looking to bolster their program and profile - and has the boosters to fund it - they can pay players...which is happening now, just it’s under the table. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics