Reply to If you had two under two and then had a third

Forum Index » General Parenting Discussion

Reply to "If you had two under two and then had a third"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]First Galway 15 months, second was 24. They are such good friends. It was awesome[/quote]
OP here- this is sort of the spacing we're contemplating. First gap 15 months and trying now (and succeeding) would mean a 20-24 month gap. It would also mean three under three. But now that we're in a groove I'm debating...upset the apple cart and throw us back into chaos and just be done? Or since we're already in chaos what's one more?

Truthfully the longer we wait the less I think I'll be inclined for a third. [/quote]

I never ended up having a third even though I wanted one. By the time I felt I could have done it my 2 kids were 4 and 6. Right now life is relatively easy bc they are very close, have same interests, do everything together, so we do a lot together as a family. For me personally, even though I could manage it now, I am less inclined bc they are 6 and 8 and I think the age gap would be too wide. Mine are independent now and the thought of having to start over again with sleepless nights, toddler tantrums, etc and not much in common with the older 2.

If I had a redo and had more energy and time, I would have done 3 back to back.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics