Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "GOP Rep Boebert allowed to concealed carry in DC— due to Roberts Court and Scalia"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think the problem is that Scalia and the conservative legal establishment rewrote 2nd Amendment law? https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/05/nra-guns-second-amendment-106856 [quote]How the NRA Rewrote the Second Amendment The Founders never intended to create an unregulated individual right to a gun. Today, millions believe they did. Here’s how it happened. “A fraud on the American public.” That’s how former Chief Justice Warren Burger described the idea that the Second Amendment gives an unfettered individual right to a gun. When he spoke these words to PBS in 1990, the rock-ribbed conservative appointed by Richard Nixon was expressing the longtime consensus of historians and judges across the political spectrum[/quote] Boebert SHOULD be breaking the law. That would be the law that DC citizens OVERWHELMINGLLY wanted. And Scalia, Roberts, Alito, Thomas, and Kennedy (i.e. the Federalist Society and their donors) took that law away from us. They changed the law. Made up a new law. And that puts DC families at risk. Seems pretty simple to me. [/quote] No. DC's laws were unconstitutional. SCOTUS overturned it. That is the way our country works. Boebert was able to get a concealed carry permit in DC. Not an easy feat. She must be qualified for the permit. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics