Reply to lawsuit against Shady Grove

Forum Index » Infertility Support and Discussion

Reply to "lawsuit against Shady Grove"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's not really she said, they said. She taped the key calls! She was in a gray zone of partner v. known donor.

She wanted the benefit of a low-income discount but not the hassles of completing the known donor policies.

In response to that SGF unwisely lawyered up. It's ridiculous. Rather than spend 7k on a courtesy discount, they are going to spend 300k+ on federal court litigation. [/quote]

what is all this "unwisely lawyered up" business?  Shady Grove faces a LOT of potential liability.  Once the doctors and administrators sensed that the the doctor-patient relationship was too difficult to continue, lawyering up made a lot of sense.  The plaintiff made a huge stinkin' deal over trying to get a discount she wasn't entitled to (discount based on family income) while at the same time claiming the opposite status (that the prospective father would not be treated like a father, but more like a sperm donor).  Can't have it both ways.  People who lose it over stuff like this are bad news.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics