Reply to Teacher Assignments

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Teacher Assignments "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I can only imagine the onslaught of angry emails and phone calls when these announcements are made. If my child loses his amazing teacher who has been rocking it at DL I'm going to go nuts. [/quote]

so privileged. that teacher is going to teach kids who need in-person learning. but hey it’s never been any secret that you all resent “those” kids. [/quote]

come on, the two are not mutually exclusive. I know everybody wants whats best for SN and at-risk kids, while also not wanting their own kids to lose out on teachers they really love. No need for the hate. [/quote]

I mean you’re literally trying to stop SN and homeless kids from getting the support they need because you don’t want to switch teachers. It is mutually exclusive. You think your child’s “love” for their teacher means SN kids shouldn’t be able to access the curriculum.

[/quote]

I’m not trying to stop any SN kids from getting in person classes. I am a proponent of them going into school because I know their circumstances demand it. What I am saying is my kids may lose great teachers in the process and that is going to upset them. Why can’t I voice that? Why does it necessarily mean I don’t want any kids getting in-person lessons? [/quote]

Not to mention the SN kids who don’t ‘win the lottery’ and the many non-IEP kids who are miserably failing at DL but have no chance of in-person.

This plan is positive for some, but it is not good enough because it causes too disruptive for the modest good it achieves.

It’s ridiculous to say the negatives are unmentionable because it does some positive.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics