Reply to Lucy Calkins admits she was wrong - stop using this outdated method to teach reading

Forum Index » Schools and Education General Discussion

Reply to "Lucy Calkins admits she was wrong - stop using this outdated method to teach reading"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I hope she's really, actually walking it back and not just putting lipstick on a pig. After all, Fairfax says it teaches "blended literacy," which is really just the cueing of Calkins with a tiny bit of phonics smattered around the edges.

I too am still working to undo damage done by this way for a child. I feel stressed to teach a preschooler to learn to read so that she won't even try to use the stupid picture/first letter cues. It's not good.[/quote]

OP here. Same. My preschooler is going learn how to read before K and I am going to have a meeting with the principal to confirm that he is placed with a teacher that is teaching using a phonics-based approach before he starts there (and going to say definitely NO to the K teacher my 2nd grader had).[/quote]

Why would you trust evidence based techniques on one aspect of learning to read, phonics, but ignore the whole part about not pushing kids to read too soon/before they’re ready and not to stress about it? If you read to/with your kid, they’ll learn to read, despite whatever technique they are learning in school. Try not to stress over it.[/quote]

From experience with my older children, "just read with your kids" is not actually a solution to everything, that's why. Trust me, my kids have all been well over the threshold of 1000 books before kindergarten and I have continued to read with the older ones as they get older. We have a book-centered culture in our house and half our family jokes, at least, come from read-alouds. [/quote]

Seriously! I think it's actually having been read to so much and being able to predict based on that that masked the underlying issues.

The chart here shows that 60% of children need explicit phonics instruction.
[/quote]

Poster above. Should have said I was a new poster of a child with dyslexia that has been harmed by Lucy Calkins.[/quote]

Totally forgot the link:
https://www.breakingthecode.com/2019-naep-reading-scores-vs-the-ladder-of-reading-a-striking-correlation/[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics