Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "Pipeline"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Pipeline parent - not pipeline dad - and I am very disappointed in our experience. Third year with the club. They win because they will drop your kid in a heartbeat if someone better comes along. The club has had two years of rolling try outs which means that you sign a contract, pay your fee, expect that a specific group of kids are on the team and your kid will possibly get some playing time - if she or he performs. Then said kid from another team rolls in midway through the season, takes a spot and current team kids get benched. It happens at every level of this club. Instead of developing the kids they have, they pull in new kids. It breaks spirits. [/quote] Sorry to hear, it really does suck... BUT, it happens at all ages, levels, and clubs. Clubs top priority will always be recruit first (new money) and then as a distant 4th or 5th is to develop. The way this pay for play system is set up, development as a individual is done on one's own time and money. Coaches treat kids and run teams like theyre playing fantasy football. [/quote] Agree, but unfortunately it's kind of the nature of the beast with pay for play and teams trying to build teams they can then brag about in their social media accounts, which in turn draws in more money. On the other hand, Pipeline and other clubs at a higher level are not a rec program and they are looking for the best players all the time to compete. This is good if you have a kid in the top tier of a top tier team and want to get recognition at the higher level. If your child is a bubble player on one of these better teams then they are always open to being relegated for the shiny new object, especially if a better player comes along. It's not about loyalty and tenure, it's about winning. You don't get to remain on a top team just because you have been there a while. To answer the OPs question, I think Pipeline boys are pretty solid throughout. Are they the best at every age? Absolutely not from what I have seen and have some pretty weak teams. However, they have a few of the top 5 boys teams in the area based on the ones we have played and watched at tournaments. Don't know much about the girls side, but I understand their talent was usually split between BA and Pipeline. I have heard most from BA moved over to Pipeline so they have kind of consolidated talent. I'm assuming the Pipeline parent poster is referring to this as their child was probably demoted in favor of an Armour player(s) moving over. Definitely a crappy situation for them.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics