Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Parenting -- Special Concerns
Reply to "school districts and divorce"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If I was divorcing one of my biggest priorities would be keeping my kids in their current schools. If that means that I use my ex's address even if custody is no 50/50, that's what I'm doing.[/quote] You might also go to jail and face very heavy fines. Stop teaching your children that it is all right to lie.[/quote] Jail? Come on. You sound like an idiot.[/quote] new poster here No, it has happened https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/celebrity/homeless-mom-sentenced-to-5-years-in-prison-for-using-friend-s-address-to-enroll-son-in-school/ar-AAHkV4W[/quote] Stop bullying this parent. The article is not analogous AT ALL. It concerned a homeless mom who registered a child at an address of a person who was not the parent. OP, register your kid at any school in which district one parent lives. Yes, the rules often (but not always) say bona fide residence is where child spends 50% plus time, but it doesn’t say anything about the Sun to Fri BS teacher mentioned above. It can include holidays, summers, etc. In any case, I’ve been divorced for 10 plus years and no school has ever asked me for divorce decree showing custody - just utility bill, lease, etc. to show residence at address. TBH, prosecution of a non-resident custodial parent when the custodial parent lives and pays taxes in the school district in which the child attends is very unlikely. There’s no way for the state that it lost anything financially. It would make the state look terrible. It would force the state to inquire into the day-by-day custodial arrangements of thousands of children. And, it’s probably family status discrimination. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics