Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Infertility Support and Discussion
Reply to "Did you know MD's IVF coverage statute excludes single women, women using donor sperm, and lesbians?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not having a partner is not a medical condition.[/quote] This is so misleading and inaccurate and ignorant. Since when is IVF a fun option for single women? Single women exhaust countless ICI's and IUI's first (just as partnered women exhaust regular intercourse and ICI's and IUI's) and go to IVF as a last resort because, wait for it!, there is a fertility problem and it's medically necessary! People get to IVF because all other measures have failed or, if they get there early, the same reasons that got them there early apply to single and partnered women, e.g., they are 35+ and time is a ticking. You seem to be assuming that single women take on IVF, for tens of thousands of dollars, because they are single alone and that all single women have perfect fertility. Apparently you think IVF should have an exclusion for unexplained infertility too or someone who is AMA who does not happen to have Fibroids but coverage for the 42-year old who does? Eek. I don't like where you are going. [/quote] I'm not ignorant. If a single woman has been diagnosed as medically infertile than she SHOULD have it paid for. But, a single woman shouldn't have IUI & IVF coverage if she has no infertility diagnosis. I'm not saying she shouldn't be allowed to conceive using these techniques I just don't think that insurance companies should pay for it. Also, I don't believe that unexplained infertility should be excluded. Just because doctors can't figure out what the problem is doesn't mean there obviously isn't a problem. The source of sperm shouldn't be in the equation here. I do have issues with AMA woman getting coverage in general because delaying conception until it is biologically difficult isn't a medical condition it is naturally what happens as we age.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics