Reply to BRYC STILL RELEVANT?

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "BRYC STILL RELEVANT?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Now that ECNL is on top of the world why wouldn't they drop them and add a club with a track record of making girls elite ex. Alexandria

Look at BRYC page they have no information about ECNL or the club they just dont care anymore and by looking at the ages record they are all bottom of the barrel teams. Alexandria or whoever should get ECNL thoughts?[/quote]

On the boys side our choice would be between BRYC and Arlington. Would hate to see Arlington replace BRYC in ECNL. That’s just kickball if the DA coaches don’t stick around.  And don’t wanna play with McLean parents, who are more political than Arlington ones. No desire to commute to VDA or Loudoun. So please keep BRYC.  [/quote]

Bryc only good boy teams are the  03 and 02 (their 2 older age groups)  their younger teams are not good at all. [/quote]

This shows good development if your best teams are your oldest teams (i.e. in the college recruitment pipeline).  If your best teams are elementary school ages and the teams become average or weak at the high school ages you should run from that club.   Some people just don't get it.  [/quote]

If the older players were with the club when younger, point taken. If not, you are just recruiting well. [/quote]

Good development and good recruiting are not mutually exclusive.  In fact, they tend to be highly correlated.

[/quote]

This is not true.  There’s no relationship between development and recruiting.  Some clubs have both, some have neither, and some have one or the other.  [/quote]

What does syc have?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics