Reply to Why did you delete my thread citing the WSJ?

Forum Index » Website Feedback

Reply to "Why did you delete my thread citing the WSJ?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]Here’s the problem. Person A, a Democrat, will accuse an official of, say, working with foreign governments to dig up dirt. Then another person gives proof that a Democratic official did same with proof it occurred. It will be instantly deleted and said to be off topic. Yet it’s often allowed in reverse and sometimes done by the moderator, along with name calling etc[/quote]

Here is another problem: In the first instance, someone -- probably a Democrat -- reports the off-topic post which is why I see it and delete it. In the reverse case, nobody reports it so I probably don't know about it. However, days, months, or even years later, someone -- probably a Republican -- will cry about it in Website Feedback.
[/quote]

So you delete things without reviewing it to see if the reporter has a point? And you also ban without reviewing? Curious.[/quote]

Where did you get the idea that I don't review the posts?  Of course I review it. That's how I know that it should be deleted. In the hypothetical example the post removed was off-topic. Not coincidentally, the most common conservative tactic is whataboutism. It is almost unusual for a thread to reach three posts before someone mentions Clinton or Obama regardless of the topic. If those posts are off-topic, which they mostly are, they get deleted.
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics