Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
General Parenting Discussion
Reply to "Soccer snacks- stupid vent edition."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think it’s ridiculous to provide snacks after games, but for every team my kids have been on where there was a snack rotation, everyone brought enough for siblings. Seems reasonable to me given that no one needs the snacks—they are just for fun, so why not include all the kids.[/quote] Snacks are for the team. Parent bring snacks for the siblings. What’s so hard about that? [/quote] It’s confusing because parents should also be the ones bringing/sending snacks for their own player in the tiny minority of cases where a post-game snack is actually needed, like where the kid is diabetic, hypoglycemic, has a super-charged metabolism, etc. If you think a snack rotation is important because it helps the team bond or just is a fun thing, why not also include the young spectators who are helping to support the team? [/quote] While I think the snack situation is stupid, I don’t understand why that’s team building for siblings. I can understand that after a long game kids are hungry and why not have orange slices and Gatorade. Little kid sitting on the sidelines Don’t need to be raidinf the team snacks. It’s a food grab! And if the little kids need something to eat then the parents should be planning and bringing their own food. [/quote] But almost no kids of team snack age are actually hungry after a 40 or 45 minute game, unless their parents failed to feed them properly beforehand. They might be thirsty, but hopefully all have water bottles. The “fun”rationale is the only one that makes a lick of sense to me, and I think it’s kind of stingy to not let the little kids who got dragged to their siblings game participate in the fun. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics