Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Felicity Huffman sentencing today"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't think she should get jail time. I don't see the point of that. Financial restitution and community service. [/quote] The point is deterrence. This is a high publicity case. What is the message if she does not get any jail time?[/quote] I think the high publicity aspect always is problematic for justice. I don't think she should receive a harsher sentence because she is famous or has publicity. she should get a similar sentence as someone else with her wealth / attorney skills who committed a fraud type crime in the $15000 range for personal gain (eg. victimless - in that she didn't steal from someone). I am never a fan of using the justice system as a means to make an example of people. Deterrence is really not effective. The next person will do it differently / think they won't get caught. There were many non celebrities in this group - we hear nothing about them. Most regular folks who aren't celebrities won't take anything from this. Celebrities will continue to find ways to buy their way around a system - they will just pay more to have someone do it better.[/quote] It’s not a victimless crime though. Through fraud, she stole a spot for her child that should have gone to someone else.[/quote] You mean somebody that paid money to the school instead of a testing facility. [/quote] A) She didn't pay a testing facility. She paid a 20-something man to fradaulent swap out test scores for a daughter who otherwise wouldn't have qualified. B) I think the PP means someone whose kid studied for the SATs and scored a sufficiently high enough test score on their own merits to gain admittance. What's the point of having kids in college who can't study for themselves and are too stupid to go? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics