Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Metro Police use tazer on bystander"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]The man was distracting and interfering with the police contact with the juvenile. He was also creating a disorder. He was told to move. Then he got moved. Then he rushed the officer and got tasered to subdue him. He deserved to be arrested and the force was reasonable especially considering that he had started to become physical. The woman should have been arrested also. She was extremely disorderly. The arrest of the juvenile was none of her business. She had no authority to demand to "check on" the juvenile. The police have a sworn duty to act in certain circumstances. They were there to investigate reports of assaults by armed juveniles. They detained an individual. He did not seem in distress and they certainly were not abusing him. The third parties had no standing or authority to interfere. There is a big difference between quietly filming public officials in public and officiously intermeddling in their actions while trying to incite others. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
