Reply to Banneker and Shaw to co-locate at Shaw?

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Banneker and Shaw to co-locate at Shaw?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I would prefer Garnett Patterson being renovated for Shaw MS than colocating Shaw and Banneker. Yes GP has no green space but it’s so close to Cardozo, maybe there can be joint use.[/quote]

Who uses Myer? That could be new Shaw MS. [/quote]

Co-location with Banneker and Shaw MS just doesn’t make sense. If the site is too small for Banneker, how is it going to fit Banneker and Shaw MS? Also, I don’t care if it’s Banneker kids or Cardozo kids, I don’t want my middle schooler with high school students. I agree that Garnett Patterson even without a green space is better. It’s centrally located and close to metro.[/quote]

Centrally located is good for a city wide school. The RI site is actually the best centrally located site for the feeder schools. Also great for a Banneker "expansion". Although no one know about where all the new students are coming from, a bit mythical, build it and they will come.  Kinda like the Save Saw people and their 600 seat sand alone demand. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics