Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Sports General Discussion
Reply to "Harrison Bergeron: The Ruling in the Caster Semenya Case Shows Us Where We are Going"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] If she has the intersex condition she is understood to have, then she has external "girl parts", and internal "boy parts", and XY chromosomes. That is not a biological woman. [/quote] A person with XY chromosomes isn't a biological woman if you define "a biological woman" as "a person with XX chromosomes", but [b]why would you do that?[/b] Especially in the context of athletic contests, which do not require athletes to be karyotyped before they are allowed to compete. Also, aside from her blood testosterone levels, this is how much medical information you have about her: ZERO.[/quote] Um, because that's the basic definition of male and female? Men have XY chromosomes and have male characteristics and women have XX chromosomes and develop female characteristics. What is your definition if not that?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
