Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Appeal Questions"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Let's say a kid has 125 CogAT. Would a FSIQ of 125 (still 90%+ I believe) solidify that the kid will be fine in GenEd? Or would it show that a kid can succeed in AAP? It's hard to know. [/quote] I think it shows both, the question is more about what are they looking for. IDK that they are looking for kids who can succeed in AAP as it eeems that woukd be more than what gets admitted.[/quote] Lots of kids get in with lower CogATs and WISCs. If the GBRS is good, it doesn't hurt anything to include the WISC. If the GBRS is poor, it's not likely that a 125 WISC will be enough. What were the sub scores? If any of the indices on the WISC were over 130, or if any of the sub scores were 18 or 19, that might be of interest to the committee. I've also heard that they care more about the VCI and FRI than the other 3 sections, so a higher score in any of these with a FSIQ of 125 might be compelling. [/quote] How do you know what good GBRS are? I got the packet and the comments make him sound awesome and there are lots of them. But there are 1C and 3Fs - like it doesn’t seem to match up. How do you know if the comments are good or bad compared to others?[/quote] From the results thread, it seemed like 2C 2F is considered "good" for GBRS. 1C 3F seems good enough accompanied by in pool scores. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics