Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "School Budgets released-- ESY out"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Principals can request to add staff or reallocate which is why it should look at the submitted v proposed like the Pp suggested. [/quote] So it's principals that are choosing to mess with at-risk funds not central office correct And it's principals that are choosing to change the Comprehensive Staffing Models and not central office correct[/quote] At schools that I've had experience with, yes. The LSAT should (emphasis on should) be informed of these decisions and sign off that the principal has discussed with them. Not that they get any say, but the sign off of LSAT is a required budgeting procedure. Things do still change with savvy principals who know how to aggressively petition. [/quote] Although I will say I don't know that the pot of at risk vs CSP is super clear. Looking at my school's budget last year and the at risk funding report it's not clear that the funds were used. I think the problem is the big pot of money is enough but take away the at risk and it's not enough money. They are masking what's covered by including it all together. (IMHO)[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics