Reply to McLean Soccer and CCL Nextgen

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "McLean Soccer and CCL Nextgen"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]McLean is feeling the heat for putting it's youngers in sh*tty NCSL [/quote]

Jesus, it’s youth soccer, and pre 11v11 at that. You’re a cancer to the sport.[/quote]

1. There's no real difference between CCL and NCSL in competitiveness, so who cares? I don't even know why CCL even exists, except as another way to suck money out of soccer parents.

2. The problem with McLean's U11/U12 boys was a coaching issue. And that's something which really matters, not the silly CCL vs NCSL vs ECNL debate. Fortunately, it's being fixed.
[/quote]

How does CCL for CCL's sake suck any more money out of parents than NCSL? [/quote]

Isn't it more expensive for the club?
[/quote]

Not when they need fewer coaches for the younger ages because the A and B team are always at the same field. I doubt league fees are that much higher if at all. Of course NCSL lowers their cost by requiring a parent from each team to volunteer as a AR. [/quote]

They don't lower the cost to the teams they just save themselves some money.  For example ODSL uses non-parent ARs and the fees are the same if not cheaper.  CCL also uses paid AR and as another poster mentioned previously the fees are relatively the same.  The volunteer AR is a pain and should not be implemented.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics