Reply to MCPS Boundary Reassessment

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "MCPS Boundary Reassessment"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

There are more under-enrolled schools than you might think. If you look at the School Utilization Analysis chart from the Nov. 15th BOE meeting, there are 34 schools which are projected to have over 100 available seats each [b]by 2024-25[/b]. See pp. 16-24:
[url]https://www.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/B6NK2S4FB611/$file/181108%20Boundaries%20Facilities%20Hearing%20Follow-up%20Qs.pdf[/url]
[/quote]

More accurately - [i]in[/i] 2024-25. It's already almost 2019. And here's the boundary study process: http://gis.mcpsmd.org/boundarystudypdfs/BoundaryProcess_BriefDescriptionFeb2016.pdf

If MCPS is going to do boundary changes on a large scale to fix capacity problems, then

1. MCPS is going to have to do boundary changes much more frequently, and
2. MCPS is going to have to change the boundary study process so that it takes a lot less time and a lot fewer resources.

Both of these things are theoretically possible, but -- in my opinion - politically impossible. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics