Reply to Dionne Reeder has no plan for Paid Family Leave

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Dionne Reeder has no plan for Paid Family Leave"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Thanks for the link but it only has information about why White isn’t endorsing. The last question in my comment was genuine. I support paid family leave and 77. However, agree that Silverman should have worked more closely with activists for ESA. Do you have links to more articles with quotes from Silverman about her work east of the river? That is the deciding factor for me to determine if she has improved on the mistakes early on in her term. I read somewhere that she regrets it, but would like to see proof of some action.

[quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]It took 4 years for Elissa Silverman to care about black voters east of the river. She’s finally starting to learn from her mistakes, but is it too little too late? The groups backing Silverman and mostly white, just like the democraphic of her supporters and canvassers. Is there any proof that she’s actually reaching out to community groups in wards 7 and 8?[/quote]

Silverman has always cared about black voters. Many of her canvassers are black and Hispanic. If you want evidence that she has worked to help those across the river, just see today's Post article:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/the-man-in-the-middle-of-dcs-ugliest-political-race/2018/11/03/e10bc142-ddfb-11e8-b3f0-62607289efee_story.html

Despite the fact that Reeder is a friend and supporters of Trayon White, White hasn't endorsed her and is staying neutral in the race because Silverman has been one of his most supportive colleagues:

"Elissa has been the most supportive of things that White has pushed on the table."

"Silverman, too, has forged a friendship with White, backing several of his bills."

It is really sad that Reeder supporters are so quick to stoke racial divisions in this race. When Bowser talks about Silverman having a "national agenda", it's a lot like Trump talking about "globalism". It suggests a lack of commitment to local issues which is obviously not true for Silverman. Reeder talks about the need for a "local" candidate as if Silverman is from Mars. All of this is very divisive rhetoric aimed at suggesting that Silverman is not "one of us". That of course raises the question of just who is the "us" in question? Throw in Lopez holding the mic for a speaker to call Silverman a "fake Jew" and things are getting really ugly.

[/quote][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics