Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "DC United's New Youth Plan"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=RantingSoccerDad][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]LMVSC?[/quote] Why not? Their older teams are doing really well and have some really talented players that should probably be getting more attention. The younger teams also have lots of potential and they seem to have coaches that really care about developing the individual players while trying to play quality soccer instead of kick and run. The diversity in the community that feeds LMVSC is passionate about soccer and could possibly support a lower division team if clubs were given the opportunity to enter an open system of promotion/relegation.[/quote] Here you go ... https://rantingsoccerdad.com/all-about-promotion-relegation/ [/quote] Thanks, but main point was why the poster had an issue with LMVSC being listed as a club and not the others. Why is that club inferior to the others listed. Yes it doesn't have DA, large $ resources, or as many "high profile" coaches but is doing more with less. 2 of the clubs listed play kick ball most of the time and rely mostly on player's size and physicality.[/quote] I don't think that it is appropriate to single out LMVSC as an inferior club. They have some strong teams. Last year, for example, LMVSC 03 team won the state cup. They beat Loudoun Red 8-1 in that competition. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics