Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Protests about Princess Eugenie's Wedding"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]She should get what she wants for her wedding. If they don't want to pay for security detail, don't provide security detail. But that shouldn't stop her from having (and I'm assuming paying for herself or using what she is allowed to use) what she wants.[/quote] Pretty sure the whole shindig is financed on the brit taxpayer dime.[/quote] Nope. Andrew is paying for the costs of the wedding. And the way that the queen gave the land and the rest to the government, the British government comes out ahead anyway. [/quote] The ceremony costs of 750K are being picked up by the Royal Family, Andrew, and the Brooksbanks. However the security costs of 2 million are being paid out of public taxes. Andrew should cover it all. [/quote] This woman who demands an open air carriage ride for her wedding is just nuts. She's no Meghan![/quote] Judging by the articles crucifying her - she definitely is not. And she's had her whole life (30 years) to build any sort of rapport with the British public. Apparently its non-existent because they know the Yorks are slackers and ungrateful. [/quote] [b]And what does Prince Charles do to earn his keep? [/b] Have an affair and marry his mistress? Most of the royals are tools. It would be fine if the inbreds just ceased to be.[/quote] Charles, separately from his wife I might add, attends and conducts more 500 working events a year in addition to raising more than ten million a year for U.K. charities. He's a tool as far romance goes but no one disputes his contributions to society or royal public perception. https://www.royal.uk/the-prince-of-wales[/quote] princess eugenie would love to be a working royal but Charles wants to reduce the # of people on the royal payroll. Which is fine-but then you have a second string group of royals who are too famous to hold a regular job but not close enough to the Throne to be royal full time.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics