Reply to Article about former KKK member

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Article about former KKK member - an eye opener"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=KeithE]That scum is the epitome of the worse kind human to be found.

Many of them begin their indoctrination early in life like this miserable excuse, many more are brought into it during incarceration. [/quote]
So Keith, do you agree that Trump and McConnell and all other Republicans ought to full-throat reject this kind of scum? Why haven’t they done it?[/quote]
DP . They HAVE denounced it. Trump called white supremacists "repugnant" and specifically called out the KKK. And he's done so decades before he even ran for president. 
 [/quote]
[b]Really?  Calling them “very fine people” doesn’t sound like denouncing them. [/b]

[quote]His alt-right fan base was correspondingly joyous: Andrew Anglin of the neo-Nazi website the Daily Stormer responded on social media: “He said he loves us all.” They were universally delighted by Trump’s later remarks defending the Charlottesville marchers. Duke thanked Trump for his “honesty and courage.”[/quote]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2017/09/14/white-supremacists-have-been-marching-in-president-trumps-name-literally/[/quote]
JFC. We have explained this over and over and over again, but you liberals insist on twisting his words. He was referring to those on the side of wanting to see historical statues remain up. I happen to disagree with that, but I am not a liberal who thinks that everyone who disagrees with me is an evil racist. (There are plenty of fine people who think abortion is wrong, for example, although I happen to be pro-choice.)

You asked why he hasn't denounced white supremacists, and I told you had has. Numerous times.

(And quotes from the biased WaPo don't impress me. During the campaign, the front page looked like the editorial section.)[/quote]

They're not stupid. They know what he meant.

They're deliberately confusing the issue. It's a tactic. [/quote]
We know those weren't his words. Someone wrote it for him only *after* people complained that he didn't condemn the act, several days after.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics