Reply to Alaska cruise with land component; not Disney

Forum Index » Travel Discussion

Reply to "Alaska cruise with land component; not Disney"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Holland America[/quote]

I can’t think of a line more likely to be filled with old people. [b] If you don’t want Disney[/b], OP, your next choice is Royal Caribbean.  [/quote]

At least as of last year, Disney ONLY did round-trip cruises to alaska, not one way.  The issue is that, because of the antiquated Jones Act, foreign-flagged or foreign-built boats (which all cruise ships are) cannot start from one U.S. port and end up at another U.S. port (unless they are on opposite coasts, like Ft Lauderdale to San Diego through the Panama Canal).  So the one-way boats all start from, or end in, Vancouver.  All the Disney cruises are from Seattle.
I recommend the Vancouver one-way cruises because you can see more on a 7 day trip if you are only going one-way.  Vancouver ends up getting a ton of American tourist business because of this dumb U.S. law.  It's the same law that caused a ton of problems for Puerto Rico after the hurricane, because it complicated the shipping of relief supplies.
Anyway, Disney is not a good option for Alaska.  I also wouldn't pay the Disney premium when you won't be spending that much time on the boat.
Princess, RCI, and HAL are all good choices for Alaska.  (Smaller boats might be even better for people without kids, but I think kids need the amenities of a larger boat.).  Just pick based on which boat has the kind of room you want for the week you want to go.  Alaska cruises book up much earlier than other cruises, because there is less capacity and because people tend to save up and go for big occasions (milestone birthdays and anniversaries).[/quote]

So how do Princess and HAL get around the law?  [/quote]

The other ships leave from Vancouver.  Disney doesn't have a ship that goes from Vancouver (at least as of this year/last year).  Disney is a pretty late entry to to the Alaska market.  HAL and Princess have been doing it forever and have pretty established relationships.  For years, they were the only ones with permits to go into the National Park (Glacier Bay), although in recent years, the NPS expanded the number of permits available and other lines have been able to get some.  But HAL and Princess ships tend to more reliably get to Glacier Bay.  Many of the other ships do Hubbard Glacier instead of Glacier Bay because of the limitation on permits.  (I think both are awesome.)
I'm not sure if Disney can't get into Vancouver because the slots are all taken, or if they just don't want to and prefer to go r/t from Seattle.  I think Disney only has one ship doing the Alaska route, so it doesn't have the flexibility that the other lines have.  (Most of them have 2-3 ships doing Alaska, so they might have one doing r/ts from Seattle, and some doing one-ways from Vancouver.  Some people prefer a r/t from Seattle because they don't need to get a passport or worry about open jaw airplane tickets or flying to/from Anchorage.  I personally think Anchorage is great and it's a real shame to miss it.  Nowadays it's pretty easy to do one-way tickets to Alaska.)[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics