Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Kids With Special Needs and Disabilities
Reply to "Randomized, controlled, peer-reviewed studies of OT efficacy?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Sensory integration/processing isn't a valid diagnosis, was invented by OTs and rejected by medical professionals.[/quote] People say this all the time on here trying to sound smart. Do you have any idea how the DSM is revised? By a bunch of "medical professionals" on committees voting in favor of the labels that will keep their grant revenues flowing. Just because a label doesn't have favor in that crowd doesn't mean it isn't a useful model for thinking about a child's strengths and weaknesses. Ask parents of kids diagnosed with Asperger Syndrome what I mean. Presto chango, it isn't a diagnosis anymore, either.[/quote] They review the strength of the EVIDENCE based on research conducted since the last update. It's not just about "labels." Grow up, there's a lot more in there than just autism--the diagnosis your kid obviously got and you're still bitter about it.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
