Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Rachel Weisz pregnant @ 48"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]With all the own egg/embryo freezing becoming a normal practice for those of us who delay getting pregnant I truly hope this question will begin to disappear. Right now it is more celebrity types who are having late in life babies but with the heavy push for late 20's/30's women of all walks of life to store eggs later in life babies will become more and more the norm. My sister had twins just before she turned 50 9+ years ago. At nearly 60 - she is healthy, active, in an amazing job and I don't see her parenting as any different than her much younger kids. Who cares in what form the cells came together for that baby-lucky her! [/quote] She had twins just before turning 50? Poor kids.[/quote] I just turned 50. I can't even imagine having twins right now, and I'm in very good shape. Most women in that phase of life are 15+ yrs younger, so just relating to othe moms is hard. I know having kids really late is relatively common, but I have twice seen mothers mistaken for grandmothers. I'm sure the lack of sleep contributed to it, and some people just look older than they are, [b]but it was awkward and embarrasing for everyone.[/b][/quote] oh... so better remain childless/have fewer kids then![/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics