Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "Real Estate vs Stocks"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I've been a landlord for 20+ years and the 1% have never applied to the DC metro area.[/quote] Correct. This area is too expensive. This is the wrong place for rental investments. Most investors here rely heavily on home appreciations to make money.[/quote] Perhaps, but there’s another rule that it’s stupid to have rental properties that are hours away from where you live. So what should people who live here do?[/quote] our rentals rents for around $1850/month and its current assess values are around $350k...so around 6% gross ROI. We collected these rentals around 2011-2013 for around $250-300k. [b]Just because the 1% rule doesn't apply, it doesn't mean RE is not a decent stable investment[/b]...[/quote] But it means you can earn more money investing elsewhere. Rental properties are a lot of work for something with a suboptimal return! [/quote] Considering we put down about 70k per property, or around 25%.[b]..I think it's decent return...[/b]also, we have a large amount already in the stock market and figure diversification is a sound strategy.[/quote] It’s a horrible return. You’d have 4x as much money if you’d invested in stocks [/quote] How so? So the rental was purchased for $250k in 2012 and I put down $70k of my own money. Tenant's rent has been covering/paying for the mortgage. It's now worth conservatively about $350k, or an $100k increase in 6 years...remember I only put in $70k of my own money so that's like 142% ROI. Has your stock portfolio done better? [/quote] So you’ve spent 70k (possibly more) and if you sold you’d make a 100k plus the original 70k investment. Yes, you’d have a lot more than 170k had you invested 70k in the market six years ago. You’d also have way less stress [/quote] I guess you're assuming you had matched or beat the SP500 performance the pass 6 years? have you actually looked it up and do the calculation or you just pulling this out of thin air?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics