Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "MCPS Guidance Counselor Arrested for 2 Sexual Assaults (not of students)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Sounds like both met him at his home for the first "date" and proceeded to have consensual sex, and then... I mean, not to victim blame, but who goes to someone's house (from Tinder no less) to meet them for the first time and has sex. [/quote] Lots of people. Consent to sex does not mean consent to all sex acts.[/quote] They had never met before. Sorry, the number one rule of online dating is meet in a public place the first time. [/quote] Tinder started as a hook up app, not a dating app. If someone wants to have sex with a person they just met, that is their choice. These women clearly went over with the intention of having sex. If that turns into something non-consensual, it is still sexual assault.[/quote] More details in the press release: http://www.mymcpnews.com/2017/10/19/suspect-charged-with-committing-sexual-offenses-against-two-adult-female-victims/ So one victim he met once, then the second time (on New Year's Eve) they met at his house and had consensual sex, then he got kinky. For the other victim, their first meeting was at his house and that's when the pattern repeated itself. This guy is not going to be on the cover of a beauty magazine any time soon based on his mugshot.. I wonder what they saw in him?[/quote] I’m confused. Why was he not arrested after the March incident was reported? And why did the second victim (who really was the first) wait 9 months to report her incident?[/quote] My guess is with the first incident, it was he-said she-said and that's not enough. The second case the victim probably gave similar details for her incident, so that was enough to get a warrant. Not sure why the second victim waited so long to report it. The defense will certainly ask about that also. This will be a tough case to get a conviction for.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics