Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Acceptance History for Hooked vs Non-Hooked at top private school "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Doesn't this chart mean that some kids, albeit a low percentage, are getting in even though not "hooked." After all these DCUM threads that say that you need a national award to get in to HYPS unless you are a legacy, URM, or athlete, this actually sounds pretty good to me. [/quote] That was my takeaway too. That non-hooked students are getting into HYS with acceptance rates considerably above the overall one is a comforting sign. If you look at the GPA breakdown the numbers get even better- for instance, 42% of the non-hooked students with 4.3+ got into Harvard. Yet at the same time, these numbers feel a LOT better than top publics like TJHS and the Bethesda results posted earlier. I get the feeling that there is something about the non-hooked students we're not seeing. Maybe they're nationally acclaimed award winners. Maybe their parents are top donors even without an alumni connection. This is a cursory glance at what the process could be like, but there is a lot of detail missing. [/quote] Be aware that these are acceptance numbers, so it may be the same top 10 or so students getting into many of the top schools. You can't conclude that a typical student has the acceptance percentage chance of getting accepted.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics