Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "The Guardian article. Is DC immune to this London market phenomenon?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Many cities have "homestead" exemptions, which are property tax cuts for people who actually live in their homes. All it takes is for a politician to say that we should "cut property taxes" for residents. Everyone will vote for it since the absentee landlords live in Russia and the Middle-East. Then raise property taxes on everyone else. If the absentee landlords are happy paying extra property taxes, then fine. At least they are contributing extra to the city's budget.[/quote] The problem is that the "homestead exemptions" are also a means for landlords to pay more taxes. Typically people who own rental houses/property are more affluent and politically connected. So I doubt it would be able to pass. If you tried to only make the tax apply to "vacant"properties, then there is the question of what makes a property "vacant" and how do you prove it? My understanding is that in Vancouver they passed a tax on foreign buyers. I am not sure that such a tax would be legal in the U.S., particularly considering that the U.S. has Bilateral Investment Treaties with most countries that typically prohibit this type of targeted taxation of foreign investment. It could also potentially violate the equal protection provisions of the 14th Amendment.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics