Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Health and Medicine
Reply to "Sunscreens -- Consumer reports vs EWG"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Please pay no attention to EWG. They are an extremely unreliable source. Use any sunscreen as long as it protects you from both UVA and UVB rays.[/quote] Tell me more about this-- why unreliable?[/quote] Not that poster but they mark products down because there is a "possibility" certain ingredients may be harmful. They are only at the hypothesis stage of studies. They rarely have evidence to support those assertions. To me that's dangerous. We "know" sun exposure can cause deadly melanoma. Better to use a chemical sunscreen than avoid it. Some people can't afford regular use of physical block sun protection and choose to go without instead of using "scary chemicals." That's what bugs me most about EWG.[/quote] Seriously, most of the products that they rate highly (based on ingredients) perform poorly in tests of how well they block UV rays. Skin cancer is one of the most common cancers, and this usually outweighs the theoretical risks of these chemicals. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics